Among the strategies discussed on your site I was looking for arbitrage strategies (no chance of loss), such as this: you buy a $50 put for $1.00 and you sell three $47 puts for $.38. The total net credit on the transaction is $.14.
Even if the index slips quickly the $47 you will have enough money to buy back the sold puts with the money you make on the $50 puts. If the index closes $47-$50 you will make money. If the index closes above $50 you will make enough to cover your commissions. If there is a rapid decline to $47.50 I could sell a $47 put and buy a $46 put for overnight protection.
Thank you for the question. There are a few different topics that I would like to address in my response.
First let’s start with your strategy. This is not an arbitrage play. You may feel like you can adjust your risk at a moment’s notice, but catastrophic overnight events can create enormous gaps in the market. 9/11 is a great example. The market did not open for days and there was no way to hedge your risk (the futures market could have been used to lock in your loss, but they instantly priced in an enormous drop).
In the trade above, your breakeven point is just below $46. If the index moves below that level, you will start to lose money. This strategy is called a ratio spread because you are selling more options than you are buying. You are naked two of the $47 puts and you will need to put up naked margin for that position. When the index falls to $47.50, you are not reducing your risk, you are adding to it by selling another put credit spread ($47-$46). I am wondering if you meant to say that you are buying in a $47 put and selling a $46 put. In that case, you are reducing risk, but not much.
Let me first start I saying that I don’t like these strategies. They are consistent and you can make small amounts of money over extended periods of time. However, one big event will wipe out years of profits and then some. After 20 years, I have seen it many times.
As for arbitrage strategies, they are truly riskless. For example, you would buy a $50 put and sell a $49 put for a credit of $.02. Assuming that $.02 covers your commissions, there is no way you can lose money on this trade.
No one in their right mind would sell you the spread because they are guaranteed a loss. The only way you can establish this trade is to leg in. That is what Market Makers do.
Market Maker firms have the deepest pockets on Wall Street. They pay membership fees to the exchanges for the right to make markets in a particular equity or index. The exchange protects these members by making it difficult for a retail customer to post a bid and an ask. Brokerage firms are allotted a certain order cancellation percentage. When the brokerage firm’s cancel to fill ratio goes above a certain point, the exchange charges the brokerage firm for each cancel. The brokerage firms identify the source of the cancels and then they start charging the customer. This means that on a retail basis you can’t post and cancel bids and offers in an effort to buy bids and asks.
Even if you could do this without the cancellation fees, you would be competing with some of the most sophisticated computer systems in the world. They auto quote the option markets based on the underlying stock, the other stocks in the group or the sector, option pricing models, the other bids and asks in other option serie… Large financial firms hire the best programmers. When the firm does get filled on an order, the system recalculates the risk in if needed; it instantly hedges the position using the underlying stock.
Large institutions have lower transaction costs, better research, lower carrying costs, and lower margin requirements. They have reduced the profit margins on these trades to the point where only the most efficient systems can compete.
If you think about it, everyone would love to make money on a riskless trade. That type of opportunity attracts stiff competition.
If I can nail home one point in this response it would be – forget about arbitrage strategies.